

PROPOSAL
- Systems of housing/commerce/business more economic than the existing ones.
- Linear grouping along a N-S axis on the island border, especially on the West coast (a line permits continuity)
- Possibility of a pseudo reticulated intra-island enlargement whenever lots are available or the existing buildings are adapted.
- The search of a multi-directional dialogue among architecture, individual and city (the breaking of the limit through a space-programmatic continuity)
- Typology is considered a connection with city facilities (street, tram, bus, taxi, wifi, heating …)
- Recuperate the idea of “street” and “square” as public places of human scale and permanent activation with spatial-temporal programmes.
- The creation of new typology: elevated squares, parks and streets, which can break the hieratic reticle of
- Optimize the relationship between architecture – environment to reduce energy consumption with the resulting economy it would imply. We could thus optimize the layout of any piece according to sunlight and vary their distance without modifying the city density (thanks to increasing the section uses in the new elevated streets and squares)
- Programmatical versatility planning a transformable, tuneable structure (giving the building a personality) and capable of associating on demand (apartment, loft, studio flat, work-shop, office…) Thus the permanent future activation of the area according to the city needs is guaranteed. The architecture as a dynamic element that adapts to the city and transforms it.
- The solving of speed intersection conflicts by means of stratification, achieving a spatial-temporal co-existence and the optimization of itinerary (contraction of the urban distortion net) Such stratification will never imply a disconnection among activities.
- Visual connection among levels and the layout of a series of spatial association elements (ramps, escalators, elevators, stairs…) which will induce to a spatial connection between layers and activities.
- The structure planned will enable a spatial continuity (vertical inside the buildings and horizontal between them) in levels of equivalent privacy (vertical privacy gradient) or equivalent/compatible programs (The breaking with the idea of containers of piled-up, independent boxes whenever it is possible)
Despues de haber hecho un estudio al transporte publico mas utilizado en manhattan (subway).Hemos descubierto que existe una relacion entre lo que sucede arriba y abajo,esa relacion la podriamos llamar caos, caos de diferentes tipos de redes (viarias,flujos de gente,...)tambien hemos encontrado estaciones degradadas por su uso y por el paso de los años. Por todo ello pretendo seguir una linea de accion entre lo virtual y lo real. De esta forma, crear espacios intermedios que sirvan de union de estas redes y no de cruce. Puntos de encuentro y no de paso. Reactivar las relaciones humanas en estos espacios ya existentes. Hablamos de actualizar,reciclar y en definitiva, crear espacios que fomenten la interactuacion entre los propios usuarios.
After studying the Downtown area we have found that one of the main problems is the lack of space and the poor activities for children. We have decided to act in two ways: first, with hybrid family buildings. These will have common spaces for kids available all the year round.
The other way will consist in parasitize some spaces of the area to include other activities that don’t take place in the building and at the same time completes the neighbour’s life.
This second action will connect with the first one.
Small communities will be formed for the families of a same building and at the same time this communities will be interconnect using as link the zones of activity.
AL3307
This is a one year Projects Workshop run by Carlos Arroyo at the ESAYA (Escuela Superior de Arte y Arquitectura) of the UEM (Universidad Europea de Madrid), a member of the Laureate International Universities Network.
Unit T-33 works within the sharing space and the downtown 2010 - manhattan research frameworks